It must be a frustrating time for scientists and pure mathematicians. They, like the rest of us, will be bombarded with election material for the next five weeks. But they will, perhaps, be more anguished by it. They will have to listen to the nation’s leaders utterly focused on a time scale of five short weeks. They will hear extravagant promises. They will hear about money being dealt out for the peripheral and ephemeral. It will be money for programs for bureaucrats and consultants to listen and report. They will hear of the budgetary deficit and the current account deficit, of interest rates and the lack of savings and investment. They will hear of glib solutions and vote-catching slogans. They will hear of artificial training programs to keep young people off the official dole queue.
But they will hear nothing of Australia’s scientific, research and engineering base. They will hear nothing of Australia’s fragile place in the world’s scientific and research community. None of these critical matters will sound in a vote in five weeks, so who cares? What does it matter what happens five or ten years away when one can be thrown out of political office in five weeks?
Yet Australian science and research is at a crucial point. If our total research effort, whether government or privately funded, falls below a critical mass, Australian scientists will get shut out of a lot of the international intercourse in science and research. If we do not contribute significant research, international science will ignore us. We will not be pulling our weight. At present our percentage contribution to world research … somewhere between 1 and 2 per cent in most significant fields … earns us an international place. It means we get far more than we put in.
Continue reading “1996_02_february_leader01feb”