In theory competition should bring prices down. It seems bizarre, therefore, that the Independent Competition and Regulatory Commission has recommended that the ACT Government allow full retail electricity competition in the ACT even though the commission acknowledges that the residential consumers would pay on average about $2 more per month for electricity.
The commission argues that if the ACT does not allow contestability, the ACT would lose competition payments from the Commonwealth. These payments are made under an agreement made in the 1990s between the states and territories on one hand and the Commonwealth on the other to gradually break down state held monopolies – mainly in utilities like electricity, water, gas, building approvals and so on. Unlike private sector companies, the state monopolies had largely escaped the requirements in force against monopolies since the mid-1970s. The privatisations and breaking down of monopolies have not been altogether successful. In Victoria, in particular, they have been met with higher prices and lower reliability. True, the prices might have gone up anyway and supply might have been more erratic anyway, but that is not the way consumers see it. They are more wont to look back to the “”good old days”.
There will be some political risk for the Government in accepting the commission’s advice, particularly as ActewAGL has been singularly successful in providing reliable supply – perhaps the most reliable in the country over the past decade – at low prices – at present 20 per cent below the national average. Moreover, ActewAGL has done this in the face of competition that was introduced in the commercial sector.
Continue reading “2002_05_may_leader24may electricity”