When Julie Bishop was elevated to the Education Ministry this week some papers dragged out a 2003 interview in which she described herself as an “economic dry and a social liberal” which she said reflected “mainstream Australia these days”.
The comment seems off the mark given the make-up of the Government which is mostly economically dry and socially conservative. Nor is it true of much of the Labor Party which is economically troglodyte and socially conservative.
But it is not off the mark when you consider that both the Government and the Labor Party are dogs being waved by powerful tails. In Labor’s case it is the unions and the remnant influence of the Catholic Church. In the Government’s case it is the National Party.
Nearly all the economic dullardism on the Government’s side comes from the Nationals and a lot of the social conservatism does as well. Obviously, John Howard’s social conservatism contributes significantly, but even then Howard gets succour for those views in the joint party room and Cabinet from the Nationals. Without it, social liberals would have been able to exert more influence.
Continue reading “forum for saty 29 jan 2006 nationals”