The Australian Labor Party is facing yet another period of self-doubt and self-reflection. At a state level, the party has never been more successful. It is in government in all eight Australian states and territories. Yet federally, it third election defeat in succession caused grave misgivings about the party’s direction. Those misgivings were in broadly three areas: the party’s organisation, its policy and the way it is selling itself.
Those misgivings manifested themselves at the weekend with the disclosure of a submission by federal front-bencher Lindsay Tanner to a party review panel that was set up after the last election and by the announcement by three major unions that they were considering disaffiliation with the party. The leaders of two of those unions resigned from the party, one of them joining the Greens.
Mr Tanner’s concerns were directed at party structures, rather than policy or how the policy and party were being presented to voters. His argument was that there was too much branch stacking which enabled too many union officials to party pre-selection. It meant that only those with full-time political ambitions had any reason to join the party. Those that wanted to make a contribution to policy or other organisation input that was not geared to a political career were despondent. Mr Tanner’s points are pertinent. Membership of all political parties, including Labor, is shrinking as a proportion of the population. Membership of a political party is now seen only as a gateway to pre-selection, not as an opportunity to contribute to policy development. Mr Tanner correctly surmises that this was hindering the prospects of the party getting the best candidates and the best policy. Labor has gone some way to addressing the branch-stacking question, though part of that back-fired, so more needs to be done.
Continue reading “2002_03_march_leader19mar labor unions”