Federal Court judge Justice Maurice O’Loughlin said it – as it were – in black and white.
Yesterday’s decision in the Federal Court was not a resolution of the question of the stolen generations. Nor was it a resolution of the question of whether there should be a national apology to those of the stolen generations.
It never could be. Courts are not capable of doing that. All they can do is decide cases brought before them and rule in favour or one part or the other.
The Federal Court, of its nature, was not capable of doing what many had hoped: to spell out why their should be an apology.
Justice O’Loughlin accepted that the two members of the stolen generations Lorna Cubillo, 62, and Peter Gunner, 53, were taken from their mothers in the 1950s and that Ms Cubillo had been viciously assaulted by a missionary while in a white institution.
The question for the judge was whether this removal could lead to a successful claim of damages by these two (and only these two) members of the stolen generation. Was the removal a breach of the law at the time; was it false imprisonment; was the Commonwealth, as administrator of the Northern Territory at the time, liable to pay damages?
Continue reading “2000_08_augustl_stolen for forum”