1993_09_september_better15

Betterment charges on lease-purpose changes were substantially increased yesterday.

Betterment is charged according to the change in the value of a lease from the old use to the new, for example when someone wants to build a block of units where there was a single house.

Under the old rules, when calculating the “”before value”, some consideration could be given to its potential for redevelopment.

Under the change announced yesterday by the Minister for Environment, Land and Environment, Bill Wood, no consideration will be allowed for redevelopment potential when assessing the “”before value”. He said that when areas were flagged for redevelopment the “”before value” rose almost to the same as the “”after value”, thus resulting in very little betterment charge.
Continue reading “1993_09_september_better15”

1993_09_september_bud16

The blame for Canberra’s high petrol prices “”quite clearly lies with the oil companies”, the Chief Minister, Rosemary Follett, said yesterday.

“”They are milking the Territory for all they can get,” she said.

Ms Follett was addressing a post-Budget business breakfast. She said the Government intended to put pressure on the oil companies by ensuring an independent operator opened in Canberra to promote competition. She defended the half-cent-a-litre rise in petrol franchise tax, saying it would bring it in to line with NSW. It would protect the revenue base. The earlier aim of having a lower tax than NSW was to produce lower petrol prices. That had failed.

The Government’s move to bring an independent operator would help local service-station operators.
Continue reading “1993_09_september_bud16”

1993_09_september_bud17

The ACT Budget put looking after mates before good financial management, the Leader of the Opposition, Kate Carnell, told the Assembly yesterday.

She called for smarter thinking in the public sector as was happening elsewhere in Australia. She said, however, that Labor was too scared to take on the unions to create more efficient government. The inefficiency and looking after mates were affecting Canberrans’ standard of living.

“”To the majority of Canberrans, this budget represents all that was odious about self-government,” she said. “”The fears of the people in 1989, of ending up with an inefficient government that continues to cost more and more, with no direction, and without the guts to make the hard decisions, is exactly what the people have got.”

The budget was about more spending, more taxes, more borrowing and more tinkering at the edges.
Continue reading “1993_09_september_bud17”

1993_09_september_bud92

The actual outcome for 1992-93 was better than Budget estimates. On the receipts side, recurrent receipts were $12.4 million or 1.1 per cent above estimate. Capital receipts were $18.8 million (14.7 per cent) above estimate. Tax revenue was $19.7 million (4.5 per cent) above estimate due to higher rates and stamp-duty collection. Other tax measures were also above estimate: gaming, petrol, liquor and tobacco.

Commonwealth general grants were down $6.8 million (1.7 per cent) due to CPI and population recalculations.

Expenditure was $31.3 million (2.4 per cent) below estimate. Most was because of a deferral of expenditure to 1993-94 and 1994-95.
Continue reading “1993_09_september_bud92”

1993_09_september_budprev

Treasurer and Chief Minister, Rosemary Follett brings down the ACT Budget at 3pm today, (Tuesday) facing further cuts from the Federal Government and threats from teachers to take industrial action if they are not satisfied.

About $70 million has been pruned off Federal grants to the ACT. The ACT now receives almost exactly the Australian per-head average of state and territory grants. None the less that is $70 million less than last year when the ACT continued to get substantial self-government transition funds.

This means today’s Budget will mean service cuts, extra revenue, efficiency measures, extra borrowing, capital run-downs or a combination from among the five. Alternatively, there could be some plain over-estimations of revenue and under-estimations of expenditure.
Continue reading “1993_09_september_budprev”

1993_09_september_budtop

The ACT Government cut public-sector employment and increased petrol taxes, and spent the proceeds on social justice for the poorest in the community in the Budget brought down yesterday.

In Education, 90 jobs will go, 80 of them school-based. The bulk of the cuts will be in the colleges, where Ms Follett says the diversity of courses and small classes give more opportunity for cuts.

Petrol will go up by half a cent a litre through an increase in the fuel franchise fee. It will raise $1 million a year.

The Treasurer and Chief Minister, Rosemary Follett, announced in the Budget speech the immediate setting up of the Voluntary Separation Scheme. It provides $17 million for redundancies, twice that of last year. Unlike usual public-sector redundancy schemes, redundancy packages will not be available to all who volunteer.
Continue reading “1993_09_september_budtop”

1993_09_september_cats

An Assembly committee recommended yesterday a system of cat registration and impounding of stray cats.

The committee on conservation, heritage and environment said there 30,000 domestic cats in the ACT which killed an estimated 240,000 birds, 480,000 mammals and 240,000 reptiles a year.

The committee acknowledged the statistics might not be completely reliable, but said there was other ample evidence that cats were efficient killers of wildlife and could become feral if encouraged to do so through neglect.

It recommended registration with much lower fees for de-sexed cats; that cats be confined to the registered address; that wandering cats be impounded and owners charged holding a release fees.
Continue reading “1993_09_september_cats”

1993_09_september_column6

The Proportional Representation Society of Australia has just done an analysis of the 1993 election. Labor won 55.2 per cent of the House of Representatives seats with only 51.4 per cent of the two-party preferred vote and only 44.9 per cent of the first-preference vote. It got 80 seats out of 147. Proportionately, its first-preference vote should have given it only 66 seats and its two-party-preferred vote should have given it 75. That makes between five and 14 seats of unrepresentative swill in the House of Representatives.

In the Senate, on the other hand, Labor got 43.5 per cent of the votes and 42.5 per cent of the seats. That is not even one seat’s worth of unrepresentative swill.

The society hypothetically converted the 1993 results to a Hare-Clark system of mainly seven-member seats with some five- or three-member seats to make up state quotas. You might expect a raft of greens, Democrats, moralists, independents and New Age loonies to have made the grade. No so. Only one Democrat made it; in a seven-member South Australian seat. All the rest were Labor, Liberal or National. The two existing Independents would not have made it.
Continue reading “1993_09_september_column6”

1993_09_september_column13

journalists refuse to divulge sources, even upon pain of jail, they are not claiming a special privilege for themselves. Rather they are claiming protection for their sources, and in doing so protecting a wider interest of society.

These were the interests being protected by Deborah Cornwall when she refused to divulge sources to the Independent Commission Against Corruption. Last week Justice Abadee gave her a two-month suspended jail term and 90 hours’ voluntary work for doing so.
He also warned that in future he would not be so lenient. In other words, journalists would be sent to jail _ unlike armed robbers and sexual assaulters who sometimes get bonds for first offences.

It was a harmful and dumb threat. Dumb because it will not make any difference to journalists’ conduct and harmful because it might make some people less likely to take journalists into their confidence, fearing that journalists might succumb to threats like those of Justice Abadee.
Continue reading “1993_09_september_column13”

1993_09_september_column20

Drop P UE1OLITICIANS are fond of “”package”. Ministers talk of a “”package” of measures and a “”reform package”. Unions talk of a settlement “”package”. The package has become part of political lexicon.

But it a slippery word. It conjures up pleasant images _ a postie on a bicycle delivering something large wrapped in brown paper and string. Inside is a present from Auntie for our birthday. In the days of innocence nothing nasty came out of a package.

Now that politics has taken the word, its meaning has changed. A package is something to be suspicious of. Tangible packages might be IRA bombs and intangible packages can equally blow up in your face.

What is the hallmark of the political “”package”? Like the brown-paper one from Auntie, the whole package must be taken. You cannot say to the postie, “”Sorry I want only some of the package”. Nor can you say to the politician, “”I only want half the package.” That is why politicians use this sort of language: “”Here is something nice. It is called a package. And because it is a package you are going to have to have all of it.”
Continue reading “1993_09_september_column20”