Senator Bob McMullan has reassured us that any bugging of the Chinese Embassy would not result in a trade disadvantage. He said about the allegations _ that the Foreign Minister would neither confirm nor deny _ that Chinese officials would talk about trade inside the building to Australians, so the Americans _ who got first bite at the intelligence _ would not have got an advantage. Sounds like McMullan is acknowledging the truth of the bugging allegation _ that the embassy was laced with fibre optics during its construction.
The Attorney-General’s Department was pretty hot on the allegations, too. They desperately attempted to suppress them and even suppress the fact that the department was trying to suppress the allegations. The sinister nature of suppressing the fact of suppression was illustrated with an exchange with The Canberra Times. When told by a departmental officer that the Government would seek suppression of the act of suppression itself, The Canberra Times representative (who has wide knowledge in this field) said something like: “”This is unprecendented!” To which the departmental officer replied sagely: “”No; it’s not.” Of course, only he and his department would know. Anyway, McMullan’s comments and the vigour with which the government attempted to suppress the story indicate it is true. The media have been chastised, implicitly, for not acting “”in the national interest” by blowing this story when they should have voluntarily suppressed it. It is a view that does not sit well with the law _ a law passed by the Australian Parliament. The Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act embraces into Australian law the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. Section 7 says: “”Articles 1, 22 to 24 (inclusive) and 27 to 40 (inclusive) of the Convention have the force of law in Australia and in every external Territory.” Article 22 says: “”1. The premises of the mission shall be inviolable.
Continue reading “1995_05_may_columnmay30”