IT IS very galling to have statements taken out of context. The South Australian judge who made the comments out a man being allowed to use “”rougher than usual handling” in obtaining the consent of his wife to sexual intercourse suffered from this. After a long and difficult rape case, the judge made a summing up in which he said: “”There is, of course, nothing wrong with a husband, faced with his wife’s initial refusal to engage in intercourse, in attempting, in an acceptable way, to persuade her to change her mind, and that may involve a measure of rougher than usual handling.”
This was taken out of the context of the trial and seized upon by many, including the Prime Minister, to make comments. The statement, by Justice Derek Bollen, came to light in January upon the hearing of a Crown appeal on questions of law. They sparked calls for the judge to apologise and for him to be sacked and for wide re-education of all judges.
Having taken that one statement out of context, a Democrat candidate for the South Australian Parliament started a petition calling for his sacking for his “”apparent support of violence in marriage”.
Continue reading “1993_04_april_column26”