Some of the most destructive periods in the history of many places in the world occur over disputes between different ethnic groups over occupation of land and the right to self-determination on it. Usually, the disputes take the form of a prior occupancy against a newer occupant who has effective rule of the territory. Examples abound: the Kurdish disputes; Northern Ireland; Israel/Palestine; the Basque territory; Bosnia; Tibet, the Tamils in Sri Lanka, and a dozen disputes in the former Soviet Union. The list goes on. Some of the disputes involve extreme violence and war. Others are festering sores of historic discontent without overt violence. Either, however way they engender great human suffering. Invariably, the violent solution does not work and peace, reconciliation and an end to suffering come only through political leadership, which, alas, is so often lacking in these circumstances. Might is right is too often applied.
When one looks at the world’s trouble spots a pattern emerges of one ethnic or religious group feeling dispossessed and alienated from the social and governmental structure of the state in which they happen to live. Leaving aside general cries for democracy in totalitarian states, there is hardly a trouble spot on earth, now or in the past, that does not at least loosely fit this pattern.
Continue reading “1993_07_july_leader11”