Journalism and other writing
Fourteen public sector unions will step up their campaign this week to delay the start of the separate ACT public service on July 1.
Also this week, the Assembly’s committee on the new public service is continuing to scrutinise the ACT Government’s Public Sector Management Bill which is the ACT side of deal.
The following is a summary of the main sticking points over the ACT and complementary Federal legislation.
(SUBS please use appropriate bold):
Continue reading “1994_05_may_actps04”
ACT Public Sector Employees will have a clear statement of principles and obligations from Day One in the new service.
And this will be the base of disciplinary practice.
Unlike the Commonwealth and most state public-sector employees ACT employees will have a code which can be found in one place, Section 9 of the Public Sector Management Act.
Further, all disciplinary matters a conducted with reference to the code. Section 179 says “”an officer shall be taken to have failed to fulfil his or her duty as an officer only if he or she fails to comply with Section 9.
Continue reading “1994_05_may_actps03”
There are several ways of looking at the new service: that there is no real change; that it will be a flexible, responsive body meeting the needs of a small government; or that it will be a centralist, corporatist body dominated by the ideology of the present Labor Government.
The no-real-change view is supported by the fact that the ACT service and the conditions of its employees is broadly based on what happens in the Federal Government. That is true, insofar as the ACT service will be broadly similar to state public services.
Which of the other views is better depends on how the “”management standards” work. The “”management standards” are provided for in the Bill. They will enable the commissioner to lay down standards on 26 matters, including industrial relations, terms and conditions, training, audit, equal opportunity etc.
Continue reading “1994_05_may_actps02”
“Seamless” is the buzz word when talking about the new ACT Government Service. There is to be a “”seamless” transition from having all ACT public servants as part of the Commonwealth service to having a separate ACT service. There is to be “”seamless” transfers from one service to the other.
You can just see Bernard Wolley interrupting: “Er, Minister, if it is to be seamless then it is the same fabric, so you cannot have two fabrics joined seamlessly.”
And he’s right. There will be some seams when the new ACT service begins on July 1 and about 20,000 Public Sector employees in Canberra find themselves moved by legislation from the Commonwealth Service to the ACT Government Service.
It is inevitable, if we are to have a separate service, and without a separate service we cannot be truly called self-governing. The seams are not a bad thing. What are they? How will the two services differ and what effect will that have on employees, present and future?
Continue reading “1994_05_may_actps01”
This week we saw a very uncomfortable ACTTAB and government department chucking blame at each other in public at the Vitab inquiry.
However, there is a more deep-seated conflict here _ a clash of culture between private- and public-sector ways of doing things.
ACTTAB provides an example in the much wider debate about what sorts of bodies are best private and what public.
Private companies and firms want to make a buck. To do that they have to get on with it. But to get on with it they have to cut corners. When you cut corners, you take risks. When you take risks you can lose a lot of money, or you can make a lot of money, or fall somewhere between.
Continue reading “1994_05_may_actpol07”
Small electric recreational boats will be permitted on Lake Burley Griffin under a draft plan launched (at the ANU boatsheds) yesterday.
The management plan was put out by the National Capital Planning Authority which has taken over direct responsibility for the lake and its surrounds from the ACT Department of Environment, Land and Planning.
The authority’s acting chief executive, Gary Prattley, said there would be three months’ public consultation on the draft, with public meetings and briefings by authority officers to affected organisations.
Under the draft, electric boats would be restricted to 3 knots (about 5.5km/h) and would require a permit. But details have not been worked out because the public consultation might reject the idea.
Continue reading “1994_04_april_lbg”
The idealism is there. The Braidwood boy (youngest of 14 _ eight boys and six girls) now Deputy Chief Minister wants Canberra to retain its essential goodness.
David Lamont was installed yesterday as Deputy Chief Minister and Minister for the Three Rs _ not Education, but Urban Services, “”rates, roads and rubbish.”
Already the famous “”Yes Minister” briefs and boxes have arrived. He snatched 15 minutes between them yesterday to fulfil his open-door policy to the press.
Continue reading “1994_04_april_lamont”
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornful tone, “”it means just what I choose it to mean.”
Parliamentary drafters are a bit like Humpty Dumpty. And sometimes like Alice. They use words in legislation. Sometimes they rely on the ordinary and natural meaning. Sometimes they behave like Humpty Dumpty. When they behave like Humpty Dumpty, they can do some weird things.
“”In this Act “state’ includes “territory’,”” for example. Sometimes black is defined as white.
This makes legislation very hard to read. Especially big Acts, like the new Industrial Relations Act (about 400 pages). You do not know if Humpty Dumpty has been to work on a particular word, or what Humpty means by it, without constant thumbing back to the definition section.
Moreover, Humpty can sneak in definitions in other parts of the Act.
The new Industrial Relations Act which came in to force on March 30 is causing quite a deal of fear and loathing out there.
Continue reading “1994_04_april_ir”
The powers are separating in the ACT.
Remember John Bjelke-Petersen, the former Queensland Premier, faltering under cross-examination in the Fitzgerald inquiry. He did not have the faintest idea what the doctrine of separation of powers is.
“”You, you, you tell me,” demanded the former Premier, head of Executive Government, leader of the majority party which dominated the single House legislature and which had made every judicial appointment for the past 10 years and which had passed laws limiting judicial discretion for a decade.
Continue reading “1994_04_april_forum16”
This may sound far-fetched, but it is possible.
An adviser to independent, maverick, no-self-government coalition of one Dennis Stevenson has proposed a cunning new below-the-line party voting system.
A couple of months ago the Follett Government backed down on an above-the-line party vote system. It was to have been grafted on to the Hare-Clark system. A tick in the party box would be deemed to be a vote for the party list lodged in the Electoral Commission before the election.
The Liberals and Independents squealed foul.
They said it would be a breach of the 1992 referendum result. Independent Michael Moore threatened a no-confidence motion in Chief Minister Rosemary Follett.
Continue reading “1994_04_april_forelect”