The court divided. Justice Brennan was in the minority. His minority judgment has been seen (incorrectly in my view) as a “”natural law” position as distinct from a “”positivist” position. And even though he was in the minority in this case, it has been seen as part of a general swing by the High Court towards the “”natural-law” view of the world.
Natural law goes back to ancient times and has taken many forms. Broadly, it appeals to some higher form of universal morality beyond church and nation. Legal positivism, a creature of the scientific age scoffed at this, arguing that the only law was the law factually promulgated and enforced by the state. The positivists argued that natural law was a lot of unprovable wool.
In the face of continuing world horrors, however, the natural-law position is now gaining more respectability. Murder is murder, rape is rape, we all know that, so it doesn’t matter if the “”positive” law in Bosnia at the time allowed it _ to put the natural-law position at its crudest.
Continue reading “1994_05_may_column02may”