1994_06_june_actplan

A “”groundswell of community confusion” has resulted in the ACT Assembly’s planning committee bringing its review of planning legislation off the back-burner.

Opposition Planning spokesman and committee member Greg Cornwell said yesterday that submissions would now be sought on planning law. He had earlier called for a review citing “”the groundswell of community confusion about planning matters, in particular the impact of current development procedures on residential neighbourhoods”.

In the past year there has been widespread complaint from residents of stand-alone residences about nearby conversions to dual and multi occupancies, especially in the older suburbs of Red Hill and Yarralumla.

Mr Cornwell said that at the time of the Draft Territory Plan following the post-self-government 1989 planning law, few people realised the full implication of the multi-dwelling rules: that single residences anywhere in Canberra could be converted to one- or two-storey multi-dwelling residences on the one block and that in some place blocks could be amalgamated to build units.
Continue reading “1994_06_june_actplan”

1994_06_june_actplan

A “”groundswell of community confusion” has resulted in the ACT Assembly’s planning committee bringing its review of planning legislation off the back-burner.

Opposition Planning spokesman and committee member Greg Cornwell said yesterday that submissions would now be sought on planning law. He had earlier called for a review citing “”the groundswell of community confusion about planning matters, in particular the impact of current development procedures on residential neighbourhoods”.

In the past year there has been widespread complaint from residents of stand-alone residences about nearby conversions to dual and multi occupancies, especially in the older suburbs of Red Hill and Yarralumla.

Mr Cornwell said that at the time of the Draft Territory Plan following the post-self-government 1989 planning law, few people realised the full implication of the multi-dwelling rules: that single residences anywhere in Canberra could be converted to one- or two-storey multi-dwelling residences on the one block and that in some place blocks could be amalgamated to build units.

He said, “”In some ways the delay has been useful because more people understand the implications of planning law now and so submissions to the committee will be better informed and cover a wider cross-section of the community.”

The chair of the committee, Wayne Berry, will now write to the Minister for Planning, Bill Wood, inviting a government submission.

Mr Cornwell said the committee would also seek submissions from the Department of Environment, Land and Planning and the ACT Planning Authority. It already had some community submissions and would welcome more.

Mr Wood said yesterday that he welcomed the review and that the Government had already prepared material. He had long recognised the need for continuous review of planning laws and procedures. As new procedures came into force there was often a need for review and fine tuning.

The other member of the committee is Independent Helen Szuty.

In another planning development, an appeal against planning decisions to permit development on part of the Tuggeranong Homestead site will be heard later this month by the ACT Planning Appeals Board.

The ACT Government has a policy of 50 per cent in-fill and 50 per cent greenfields development to accommodate growth in the ACT. The in-fill has been made up of development of green bits within the present city and redevelopment of old houses with units and multi and dual occupancy.

1994_06_june_actewcom

A takeover bid has been launched for the ACT’s biggest business.

There is a lot at stake as the rival management groups vie for control of about $1.5 billion worth of assets (or about $3 billion using replacement cost accounting), about 1400 employees, a turnover of about $350 million, $31.1 million and at least 100,000 customer accounts. Continue reading “1994_06_june_actewcom”

1994_06_june_actewban

Professional engineers at ACT Electricity and Water have imposed bans on Canberra’s water supply yesterday in protest a being brought under what they call the bureaucracy of the Public Sector Management Bill.

The bans will restrict the total output of treated water, ban work on the city’s 45 city service reservoirs (the big round tanks on the hills), prevent non-urgent professional advice to ACT Government and generally work to rules.

The engineers are members of the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers Australia.
Continue reading “1994_06_june_actewban”

1994_06_june_aap

Australians abroad rejoice. No more scratching frustratingly through English-language newspapers to find one-paragraph briefs: “”Small earthquake in Newcastle, not many dead”.

No more p39 stories on Friday saying: “”Australian leadership spill on Tuesday”, only to find that the sole Australian story the following week is about a funnel-web spider or a shark.

Australian Associated Press is now on Compuserve. Compuserve is the worldwide computer network that contains everything from AIDS research to computer games.
Continue reading “1994_06_june_aap”

1994_06_june_yowcomm

Forty years ago there was some wide open land just north of a country town called Canberra. A lease over it was given, virtually for nothing, to a golf club called Yowani.

Land was plentiful. The government was giving leases away to people for houses, to charities for their purposes, to churches for church and sporting clubs for sport.

The country town slowly grew to a city and the land became very valuable. People were willing to pay a lot for it.

The golf club had an idea. Why not flog off some of its golfing land for housing and make some money so it can improve the rest of the course?
Continue reading “1994_06_june_yowcomm”

1994_05_may_whistle

Whistle-blower provisions in the ACT Government’s Public Sector management Bill were attacked yesterday as restrictive, inadequate an unlikley to be effective.

In an submission to the Legislative Assembly’s committee on the separate public service, Opposition Leader Kate Carnell, said the Government’s Bill protected public sector employees revealing “”restricted information” if it showed an indictable offence, gross mismanagement or a substantial danger to public health a safety.

The Bill she had put forward earlier this year gave a wider protection. It protected anyone (not just public-sector employees) revealing any information (not just restricted information) that showed not just indictable offences, gross mismanagement and danger to health and safety, but also corrupt conduct, dishonesty, breach of trust, any criminal offence, public waste or unlawful reprisal.
Continue reading “1994_05_may_whistle”

1994_05_may_water

ACTEW would like to move towards tenants getting water bills, rather than landlords, without increasing overall charges, its chief executive, Dr Mike Sargeant, said yesterday.

This would help conservation in the long run and bring down overall costs, but he said it was a complex matter and would take at least a year.

He was responding to criticism for the Landlords Association over Thursday’s announced changes to water billing.

At present about 30,000 of the ACT’s 100,000 households are tenanted. At present these people do not see a water bill, but under most tenancies excess water charges get passed on to them.

The president of the Landlords Association, Peter Jansen, says for efficiency and conservation the bill should go to the user direct, who would respond to larger bills with conservation. Landlords should reduce their rents accordingly _ he estimated by $1.70 a week.

“”A third of the ACT is not getting water bills and so will not be responsive to conservation,” he said.

However, he thought Thursday’s change was a step in the right direction.
Continue reading “1994_05_may_water”

1994_05_may_vitcom18

The ACT Attorney-General, Terry Connolly, has legally pulled the rug from under a major part of the Opposition’s submission to the Vitab inquiry.

The Opposition tried to say the former Minister for Sport, Wayne Berry, behaved badly by telling the Assembly that all was well with ACTTAB when he fact he knew all was not well, because Victoria had given notice that it was withdrawing from its super-pool arrangement with the ACT which would result in ACTTAB losing revenue and exposing ACTTAB to a breach of contract action by Vitab.

Connolly has written to Speaker saying the 1688 English Bill of Rights as incorporated into Australian House of Representatives practice and thence into ACT Legislative Assembly practice has held that freedom of speech by Members of Parliament is paramount. It is so important that no-one can question it in a court of law, Royal Commission or inquiry. Quaint, a hang-up from the 17th century wars between Parliament and the English Crown, but quite right. And the Speaker, Roberta McRae, agrees.
Continue reading “1994_05_may_vitcom18”

1994_05_may_vitabcom

The Great Communicator was to arrive.

It was Friday Bob Hawke was to give evidence at the Vitab inquiry. The place: First Floor of the AIDAB Building in Civic. He had to come out of the lift and walk 15 metres to inquiry room. He was trapped.

A gaggle of Television Teenagers awaited his arrival.

He answered one or two inane questions in a croaky voice and went inside not adding one iota to the store of public knowledge.

Nor did he inside. Vitab inquirer Professor Dennis Pearce has allowed the Great Punter and others to give evidence in private.
Continue reading “1994_05_may_vitabcom”

Pin It on Pinterest

Password Reset
Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail.