Beware the US jail trend

“Lofty” was in his early 40s in Beechworth Jail when he realised he had wasted his life so far and was determined that when his parole came up he would go straight. It was in the mid-1960s.

In those days prisoners were not permitted to serve their parole in Beechworth. My father, a parole officer and Anglican chaplain of the jail, pleaded Lofty’s case, arguing that the sewerage project had started as was in desperate need of labourers. Lofty was a big, strong, fit man. He would be ideal. And to send him back to Melbourne would make a relapse more likely.

He stayed in Beechworth gainfully employed on the sewerage project.

Continue reading “Beware the US jail trend”

Pell and the trouble with juries

Email if you want these weekly articles sent to you.

Read this quote:

“Having had regard to the whole of the evidence led at trial and having deliberated long and hard over this matter, I find myself in the position of having a genuine doubt as to the applicant’s guilt.”

It was written by Justice Mark Weinberg, the dissenting judge in the decision by the Victorian Court of Criminal Appeal to uphold the jury’s decision to convict Cardinal George Pell of sex crimes.

The quote shows that he has misconceived the role of appeal court judges in appeals against jury trials as things stand in Australian law.

Continue reading “Pell and the trouble with juries”

PM’s PS attack is victim blaming

Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s homily to the Australian Public Service at the Institute of Public Administration this week was a most damnable piece of organisational victim blaming.

He urged public servants to serve the public, the “quiet Australians. He called on them to be innovative. He called on them to be apolitical and dutiful.

He was clearly blaming them for not being so.

Continue reading “PM’s PS attack is victim blaming”

Treating symptoms no help to Australia

Email if you want the weekly column sent to your email address on Saturdays.

This is not a joke. A patient comes to the doctor and says: “Doc, I have put on quite a bit of weight. I cannot fit into my clothes. I cannot fit into the office chair. And my blood pressure is right up so I suppose my arteries are clogged.”

“Well,” says the doctor. “We will have to get those arteries unclogged even if it costs a lot of money. And you must buy a new chair so you are comfortable at work. And you can buy new bigger clothes so they fit your new size. Other than that you can keep eating the same or more. We need not worry about how many calories you bring into your body.”

It sounds bizarre. What doctor would advise expensive “treatment” of symptoms and say nothing about the underlying cause of the patient getting bigger and bigger to the detriment of the patient’s well-being?

Well a similar thing is happening with the size of Australia. We are getting far too big and instead of trimming the intake, the government and all of the vested interests say we must just build more infrastructure.

This week, Infrastructure Australia published its Audit and found that “road congestion and public transport crowding cost the Australian economy $19 billion in 2016. Without continued investment in our cities, this will double by 2031 to reach close to $40 billion.

“This impacts quality of life, as well as our economic productivity and competitiveness as a nation. . . .

“More than $123 billion of construction work has commenced since 2015, with a committed forward pipeline of over $200 billion. However, there is much more to do to ease the pressures of growth. . . . 

“Infrastructure in our four largest cities – Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth – is failing to keep pace with rapid population growth, particularly on the urban fringe. With our population projected to grow by 24% to reach 31.4 million by 2034, our largest cities are expected to see pressure on access to infrastructure.”

It sounds like the Australian patient is choking to death and the arteries cannot keep up, but the doctor refuses to prescribe a lower intake. The elephant in the room is ignored.

Infrastructure Australia just assumes the high population growth – now at 435,000 a year – has to happen and that there is nothing we can do about it.

But we can. John Howard could have just as easily have said, “We decide how many people come to Australia and when they can come.”

But no. He pretended to be securing the borders by clamping down on people smuggling by boat while quietly ramping immigration through airports from around 70,000 to now more than 200,000 a year.

Small wonder Infrastructure Australia says we cannot keep up. It says we have “a mounting maintenance backlog”.

Howard confirmed his subterfuge this week telling the BBC, “My experience as almost 12 years as prime minister was that whenever the Australian population thought that immigration was being controlled and properly monitored they supported high immigration.”

They may have “thought” immigration was under control, but it was not. It was out of control and running way too high at the behest of those who profit from it: property developers; big retail and big agriculture.

Meanwhile everyone else suffers. Wages in Australia have stagnated since the Howard ramp-up of immigration and the costs people cannot escape have spiralled: health, education, energy.

We now have “per capita” recession in Australia. That is, on average people’s incomes are contracting. And that is average. Given the top end is doing much better it means those in the middle and bottom are really being squeezed.

We have an illusion of decades of notional economic growth because we have a lot more people producing things. But they are consuming it as well and demanding more infrastructure and government services, so the absolute growth in GDP may give the government a proud boast, but it is an empty one because most people are becoming worse off.

They are also being squeezed by the contraction in public-sector spending on the middle and lower incomes for two main reasons: disproportionate tax cuts for the well off and a massive diversion of resources to pay for the infrastructure required by all those immigrants.

Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese called this week for a mature debate about population. Good, even if corporate Australia will take no notice. Hitherto anyone calling for lower immigration has been branded racist. The answer to that is that the immigration burden cripples all but the top end in Australia whether they are black, brown, yellow or white.

Moreover, the top end which benefits from high immigration has a much larger portion of white males in it than the rest of Australia. 

The big corporations and their shareholders are dominated by wealthy white males. So you might well argue that the high immigration that favours them and helps keep them in a position of privilege perpetuates racism while hitting hard everyone else – including almost all recent immigrants from non-English-speaking countries – as they struggle to find and pay for health, education, transport and energy.

Yet there is not even the hint of a suggestion by Infrastructure Australia that its expensive Infrastructure prescription could be easily avoided and the lives of Australians made better if we cut population growth.

Decentralisation is offered as a solution. It is not. The Murray-Darling Basin has been starved of water by big agriculture and corrupt practices. 

The main reason average Australians feel worse off is because of the high population growth in the past two decades. Immigration should be drastically cut before the anger at the economic squeeze is manipulated to be misdirected at ethnic, cultural or religious differences.

Before that cut will happen, though, we have to ban what underpins high population policies – corporate political donations.


This article first appeared in The Canberra Times and other Australian media sites on 17 August 2019.

If you want free speech get a Bill of Rights

You can almost hear the exasperation in the words of the High judges last week. They wrote: “As has been emphasised by this Court repeatedly . . . . the implied freedom of political communication [in the Australian Constitution] is not a personal right of free speech.”

In blunter language they may as well have said:: “Get it through your thick skulls. There is no freedom of speech in Australia. Stop watching American movies.”

Continue reading “If you want free speech get a Bill of Rights”

States stepping up where Feds fail

Australia so often follows the US – whether stupidly into war or in other good ways. It is happening again in the wake of both nations’ Federal Governments determination to do nothing about the climate crisis and the development and take-up of autonomous and electric vehicles to bust congestion and pollution in our cities and reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.

In both countries states and cities are giving up on the Feds and taking their own actions. And the private sector, too, is joining the fray. In their way, individuals will follow.

Continue reading “States stepping up where Feds fail”

Tenants copping energy neglect

The energy efficiency ratings in Canberra’s rental market are appalling, according to a survey published this week, and it is almost certainly mirrored everywhere else in Australia.

Some enforcement on recycling bins would help.

It means renters are paying more for energy, particularly electricity, and more carbon is unnecessarily belching into the atmosphere. The reasons are fairly obvious; the remedy less so.

Continue reading “Tenants copping energy neglect”

The private health death spiral

The Grattan Institute asked a pertinent question this week: why do we subsidise private health insurance? It offered a couple of sound policy suggestions, but they completely missed the political mark.

Coalition Governments have offered incentives for people to take out private insurance and penalties if they do not.

But it is foolish to imagine that in creating these policy mixes, the Fraser and Howard Governments were interested in the greatest good for the greatest number or the most equitable and efficient health system achievable.

Continue reading “The private health death spiral”

Privilege overrides health policy

The Grattan Institute asked a pertinent question this week: why do we subsidise private health insurance? It offered a couple of sound poliy suggestions, but they completely missed the political mark.

Coalition Governments have offered incentives for people to take out private insurance and penalties if they do not.

Continue reading “Privilege overrides health policy”

Defence: the appalling US corollary

The defence commentary that bloomed in the wake of the publication of Hugh White’s “How to Defend Australia” has largely failed to mention the appalling corollary to White’s wise assertion that Australia has to prepare itself for the possibility that the US would not come to Australia’s defence if attacked from without.

The corollary is, of course, the question as to why, over the past decades, have we sucked up to the US, done all its bidding, and entered wars at its behest that really had nothing to do with us? Why did we expend so much blood and treasure when, now, at the critical juncture of the rise of an aggressive China we will not be able to expect the help we have relied upon from the US these past 75 years.

Continue reading “Defence: the appalling US corollary”