Half a century ago a republican in Australia would have been an iconoclast _ someone who tilts at icons.
Now, the iconoclast is someone who tilts at the icon of the coming republic, which is increasingly seen as “”inevitable” and a Good Thing.
Next month will see the publication of a history of the common law, Barbarism to Verdict, by author and barrister Justin Fleming, who in an almost off-hand way joins these latter-day iconoclasts.
“”If a country can itself decide simple to remove royal authority, then it must already have independence, in which case the change of Head of State is a mere formality of no consequence which can in no way change the material quality or spirit of life,” he writes. “”It wouldn’t magically reduce the fantastic excess of prosecutions in a land where life is madly over-governed and lived out under the voracious appetite of almost every authority from parking inspectors to health authorities for court orders and penalties. The fact that there would be no royalty in Australia would not remove Australia’s dire need of a Magna Carta to address an intolerable level of official interference in liberty. The impression that change would be experienced is illusory.”
Continue reading “1994_07_july_commonlw”