The High Court came to a sensible conclusion yesterday on the question of validity of decisions of the ACT Supreme Court. David Eastman, the man convicted of the murder of AFP Assistant Commissioner Colin Winchester, had argued that the judge who tried his case, Acting Justice Kenneth Carruthers, had not been validly appointed under the Constitution.
The Constitution provides that the Federal Parliament can create federal courts and can invest federal jurisdiction in other courts. Judges of the High Court and judges of federal courts created by Parliament must be appointed by the Governor-General Council (the federal government) and must be appointed for a term expiring on their attaining 70 years old.
Eastman argued that the ACT Supreme Court was a federal court created by the federal parliament; that Acting Justice Carruthers was appointed by the ACT Executive, not the Governor-General in Council, and he was appointed for a fixed term, not one expiring at the age of 70. Therefore, he argued, the appointment was invalid and the conviction a nullity.
Continue reading “1999_09_september_leader03sep eastman”