The economic orthodoxy of fighting inflation at all costs has indeed been costly for Argentina. As Eduardo Duhale – the fifth president in two weeks – took power this week, he will inherit a bankrupt economy. That is not hyperbole. The definition of a bankrupt is one who cannot pay their debts as they fall due – precisely Argentina’s position. But unlike an individual who can declare bankruptcy, deliver up their assets for part payment of the debt and start afresh, a nation has to struggle on with the debt burden. How Mr Duhale does this is a matter of major concern for those who cherish the ideal of political and economic liberty. The rioting and violence in the streets in Buenos Aires in the past week which is a direct result of the economic failure has threatened those liberties.
At the behest of the heavily-US-influenced International Monetary Fund, Argentina began a classic reform program about four years ago. It cut tariffs, privatised state enterprises, welcomed multi-national companies, cut government spending and pegged the peso to the US dollar. For a time, things looked good. Foreign investment poured in.
The fear of inflation in Latin America is perhaps more pronounced that elsewhere because in the past inflation has run riot on occasions as governments just printed money in an attempt to meet welfare spending and often to keep corrupt payments running. So pegging the peso seemed a good idea at the time. But it was not. The enemy was not inflation – that was a mere symptom. The real enemies were unrestrained government spending and corruption. A floating exchange rate is an important way for an economy to self-correct, especially when combined with the intelligent application of monetary policy. Australia is a good example. We may well moan about the falling value of our dollar, but it has prevented some of the horrors of the Argentinian situation.
Continue reading “2002_01_january_leader03jan argentina”