The Acting Prime Minister, John Anderson, was right to suggest that Australians should welcome the Queen and give her the respect of office. His prediction that the 45 per cent of people who voted for a republic would not use the visit from March 17 to April 2 as a focus for protest, however, was so obvious as to not be worth making.
Mr Anderson would be wrong to imagine that the welcome will be ecstatic, enthusiastic or especially warm. It will not excite the Australian population in the same way that the 1954 visit did.
The 45 per cent who voted for a republic, if affected at all by the visit, will look upon it much as a visit by any other head of state or head of government from another country. And many who voted No in the referendum will do likewise because they voted No to the republic on offer, but would otherwise have voted for a republic.
The Queen gets addition interest and respect for the fact that she is head of the Commonwealth of Nations of which Australia is part and she is head of state of the nation with whom Australia has very close ties of heritage, family and trade.
But those ties are becoming more diluted over time. Just after World War II the Anglo-Celtic share of the population was 90 per cent. By 1988 it had fallen to 74.5 per cent and in 1999 to 70 per cent, according to a study of ethic make-up of Australia by Charles Price published by Monash University last week.
Continue reading “2000_01_january_leader10jan queens visit”