The strength of multi-media text searching is as much in finding what is not there than what is. CD-ROM encylopedias, with powerful searching, reveal their weaknesses just as quickly as their strengths. Here, Gough Whitlam would agree. He does not rate a full entry in World Book Information Finder on CD. He would be incensed that Malcolm Fraser does and if you search for “”Whitlam” you are directed to that entry. Unlike the book version, a searcher does not look under the volume “”W” to see if Whitlam is mentioned and then thumb through an index lugging out one volume then another. Rather the computer scans the full text of the encylopedia for “”Whitlam” and produces the results: Whitlam does not have the grandeur of his own entry. Rather he is dismissed in the entry under Fraser and Australian politics.
Stephen Hawking gets a brief history. Beethoven gets noted in 11 articles: 56 times under his own name, 11 under symphony, 5 under another article and then once or twice in the rest. The resource-number box notes there are 56 times and lets you click back and forth between them. I have now messed around with three CD-ROM encyclopedias. Microsoft’s Encarta, Encyclopedia Britannica and the latest, World Book. World Book sits between the other two for price and content. Each is on one CD. For text content Britannica leads, World Book is next and Encarta last with very large gaps between them.
Continue reading “1995_03_march_encycl”