STUART Littlemore is right. (Gosh, that hurt.) In last Monday’s Media Watch on ABC TV he said present arrangements for bringing errant journalists to book were defective.
Journalists, including this one, frequently get stuck into the professions for being closed shops, arrogant and unanswerable.
Journalists themselves, however, have to some degree escaped public accountability. There have been five mitigating factors. First, there has been an unenforceable and half-hearted tradition of “”right of reply” through the letters column. Second, there has always been the right to sue for defamation (if you have the patience of Job and the pocket of Kerry Packer). Third, there has been the right to go to the Press Council. Fourth, the journalists’ union runs an ethics committee, which once in a blue moon hears a complaint from the public. Fifth, members of the public can sometimes (at an editor’s whim) get to write articles under their own name.
All of the above, except the complaint to the ethics committee, require lodging a complaint with the media proprietor. This does not make the journalist individually accountable. Nor does it redress the situation where the journalist is under proprietorial pressure (explicit or cultural) to write in a certain way.
Continue reading “1994_04_april_column18apr”