The ACT Government’s proposal to cull kangaroos has proven to be unnecessary, according to the Canberra Conservation Council.
The president of the council, Jacqui Rees, said yesterday that no rural lessee had applied for a culling licence because with recent rain the kangaroos had gone back from farmland to the nature reserves, and departmental officials had admitted this.
The culling plan was an over-reaction. Ms Rees called on the Minister for the Environment, Bill Wood, to reverse the culling decision and look at new technologies such as the device which gave off high-pitched sound inaudible to humans but which gave kangaroos a temporary headache.
Mr Wood had questioned the device because it might not pass animal welfare requirements, “”but surely it was less cruel than kangaroo shooting which often resulted in slow deaths for the kangaroos when shooters missed an instant kill.”
<<The Opposition spokesman on planning, Greg Cornwell, said yesterday that approval for an development in Hunter Street, Yarralumla, had been given three days before the Landsdown report, which would have recommended against it, had been made public.
He said in Question Time that the Deputy Chief Minister, David Lamont, had subsequently given an assurance to residents that Hunter Street would be part of a local area plan under the Landsdown framework, but the approval for multi-unit development on a single site had already been given, contrary to the Landsdown recommendations.
The Minister for Planning, Bill Wood, said it was “”a matter for careful definition”” he would have to seek details and get back to Mr Cornwell.
The president of the Save Our City coalition, Jacqui Rees, said the Government had had the Landsdown report for 10 days beforehand so it knew that the Yarralumla decision would have been incompatible with it.
“”This is why we need an inquiry with teeth that can take evidence under the Inquiries Act to find out why such untoward planning decisions are being made,” she said.
In another planning matter, Mr Wood assured Independent Michael Moore that all due processes would be followed in the redevelopment of the Starlight Drive-In site.
Moore Independent candidate Mark Dunstone said in a statement yesterday that a lease variation to enable the development and design and siting approval had not yet been given. Brochures produced by the developer could give the impression that planning approval was not a major issue. He said consumers looking at buying off the plan should look carefully at the planning status of the development.